Tarjei's confusion
From: Peter Staudenmaier
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:10 am
Subject: Tarjei's confusion
HI Tarjei, you
wrote:
In one of his latest stunts, he asks why I'm
confused, and when I say I'm not confused, he declares that I
am indeed confused about his being an amateur historian and not
a professor, although he makes various editors of publications
think he is a professor etc. etc.
You're still confused. Which editors of which publications do
you think I have tricked into believing that I am a professor?
Do tell.
Yours for exposing fraud,
Peter
...................................................................................................................................
From: dottie zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:34 am
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Tarjei's confusion
Dear Peter,
When I joined the waldorf critics you were
told to be a Historian. I then proceeded to read the paper you
had written on Ecofascim. I was really unclear how a Historian
could mess up a mans work as much as you had and then when I
commented on this at the site it came down to 'oh I'm not a Historian'.
You were showcased on that site as a bona
fide Historian and it came out you were not just as Mr. Dan Dugan
was considered not to be an expert on Anthroposophy by the court.
Happy Easter to you,
Dottie
...................................................................................................................................
From: Peter Staudenmaier
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:59 am
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Tarjei's confusion
Hi Dottie, you wrote:
When I joined the waldorf critics you were told to be a Historian.
Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually capitalized, by
the way).
I was really unclear how a Historian could mess up a mans
work as much as you had
Why was this unclear to you? It happens all the time. Historians
frequently disagree with one another and think that other historians
have messed up.
Peter
...................................................................................................................................
From: dottie
zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:06 am
Subject: Re: Tarjei's confusion
Dottie:
When I joined the waldorf critics you were
told to be a Historian.
Peter:
Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually
capitalized, by the way).
And when did this happen Peter? And are you
aware you have stated that it is in fact true that you are not
a Historian? Or are you a Historian with a little h maybe?
Peter, the red pill or the blue one? Isn't
it about that time?
Happy Sunday,
Dottie
...................................................................................................................................
From: dottie zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:07 am
Subject: Re: Tarjei's confusion
Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually
capitalized, by the way).
I feel like I am talking to Golum of the Trilogy.
Sorry Peter but this is really getting to be ridiculous. Wake
it up man, wake it the hell up, Dottie
Dottie's
confusion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
April/May
2004
The Uncle
Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files
Anthroposophy & Anarchism
Anthroposophy & Scientology
Anthroposophical
Morsels
Anthroposophy,
Critics, and Controversy
