Tarjei's confusion

 

From: Peter Staudenmaier
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:10 am
Subject: Tarjei's confusion

HI Tarjei, you wrote:

In one of his latest stunts, he asks why I'm confused, and when I say I'm not confused, he declares that I am indeed confused about his being an amateur historian and not a professor, although he makes various editors of publications think he is a professor etc. etc.

You're still confused. Which editors of which publications do you think I have tricked into believing that I am a professor? Do tell.

Yours for exposing fraud,

Peter

...................................................................................................................................

From: dottie zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:34 am
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Tarjei's confusion

Dear Peter,

When I joined the waldorf critics you were told to be a Historian. I then proceeded to read the paper you had written on Ecofascim. I was really unclear how a Historian could mess up a mans work as much as you had and then when I commented on this at the site it came down to 'oh I'm not a Historian'.

You were showcased on that site as a bona fide Historian and it came out you were not just as Mr. Dan Dugan was considered not to be an expert on Anthroposophy by the court.

Happy Easter to you,

Dottie

...................................................................................................................................

From: Peter Staudenmaier
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 9:59 am
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Tarjei's confusion

Hi Dottie, you wrote:

When I joined the waldorf critics you were told to be a Historian.

Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually capitalized, by the way).

I was really unclear how a Historian could mess up a mans work as much as you had

Why was this unclear to you? It happens all the time. Historians frequently disagree with one another and think that other historians have messed up.

Peter

...................................................................................................................................

From: dottie zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:06 am
Subject: Re: Tarjei's confusion

Dottie:

When I joined the waldorf critics you were told to be a Historian.

Peter:

Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually capitalized, by the way).

And when did this happen Peter? And are you aware you have stated that it is in fact true that you are not a Historian? Or are you a Historian with a little h maybe?

Peter, the red pill or the blue one? Isn't it about that time?

Happy Sunday,

Dottie

...................................................................................................................................

From: dottie zold
Date: Sun Apr 11, 2004 10:07 am
Subject: Re: Tarjei's confusion

Yes, that's what I am (the word isn't usually capitalized, by the way).

I feel like I am talking to Golum of the Trilogy. Sorry Peter but this is really getting to be ridiculous. Wake it up man, wake it the hell up, Dottie

Dottie's confusion

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
 

April/May 2004

The Uncle Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files

Anthroposophy & Anarchism

Anthroposophy & Scientology

Anthroposophical Morsels

Anthroposophy, Critics, and Controversy

Search this site powered by FreeFind