Collectivism and the I AM
Date: Sat Feb 7, 2004 10:07 am
Subject: Collectivism and the I AM
Bro. Ron wrote:
"Only full consciousness
has the discernment and authority necessary to distinguish and
exorcise the tumor from healthy tissue.
"In our prognosis let
us remember that while it is deadly to destroy healthy tissue
it is equally deadly NOT to destroy that which is malignant."
Beloved Lightsearcher, my dear Grail comrade,
who has such passion and vital juices flowing through his soul,
Lightsearcher made many medical references
a long while ago to how certain forms of evil and cancer had
to be cut out of the system. This medical attack was used in
the same way America uses its current theme park enemies, Terrorism,
Ossama bin missing..(soon to be found in time for election day)
and whoever the enemy is, their Orwellian context must be reduced
to germs, malignancy, something not as human as WE in the west.
In other words we have to use Orwellian technique to reduce the
enemy to a THEM.
The enemy has to become the Orwellian monster,
painted with broad strokes and reduced from a human being or
actual thousands of human beings who lived, laughed and prayed
to god as we do, to something that is a they, an IT..(not information
technology)something we can collectively within brainwashed mental
idiocy, lump together as THE Enemy. We are good, directed by
God and they are bad. That is why President Bush and particularly
his Neocon administartion is so dangerous. It forces us away
from the I AM and consideration of the I AM's of others into
the Collective, the hive, the Orwellian double speak of spin.
Collective thinking and consciousness is brutal.
Our media has revealed itself to be the Brutal bearer of Collective
Spin, media manipulation and the owner of the one Cyclopean Eye
of Big Brother. Orson Welles in his "Citizen Kane"
revealed that he took on the Rupert Murdoch of his day and the
real story behind "Citizen Kane" is the Orwellian way
that the major studios were going to destroy all the copies of
"Citizen Kane" because Hurtz News empire was Jew baiting
because they had hurt feelings. "Citizen Kane" revealed
the vileness and danger of the Orwellian One Media control of
the world where Clear Channel and the rest of the industry have
now bought and paid for all the reporters, all the way up to
the infected BBC.
The Hutton Report and the Bush and Blair WMD
tribunals reveal the same ole, same ole "we know the public
will swallow anything" nightmare of collectivism. Some have
argued that we hate communism. Americans are Individualists.
But we are a giant collective hive of easily manipulated Orwellian
Orwellian reality obviously has been left
out of the curriculum of millions of Americans. The Brutal truth,
and the deptartment of Spin or Janet Jackson's breasts ride higher
in importance only because the collective gut level intelligence
of the pagan force in the American psyche, prefers the Orwellian
big brother to spin things that are less boring than if George
Bush, as President, is a danger, with Cheney, to the entire human
Orwell warned what was a danger to the human
race. But somehow we just can't bring our collective thinking
to underscore the equation that A = B or Orwell = Current Administration.
Never has a nightmare been so clear. From the BBC to France bashing
and causing flights and major companies to lose money over Political
issues. Issues between Canada and the U.S. The lies brought on
against Hans Blix and the U.N. These were spin that we seem to
be unable to remember or hold onto as the next days news and
a big breast comes flying over our noses. Never has hype had
such a deadening effect as a Cancer of Consciousness and a literal
numbing into sleep of the i am. Except of course where some atrocity
like Germany or Cambodia or Stalin's Russia, was spun so that
the numb masses would fail to rise up to think about the entire
illness we have sunk to.
This means 1933 and the actual Rise of the
Etheric Christ against the Rise of Hitler and all further events.
The Rise of the I AM against the collective spin and Orwell's
warnings of how the collective, intellectual soul, i am..would
eclipse the Christ Rising I AM and how STeiner took the time
to research as did Tarjei the I AM Core notes. But we can't seem
to think and put these things together so we rush to some little
group where the energy is denial and we feel happy in a little
protective intellectual soul, antipathy of a collective. Spiritual
Science and the Michael School prefers Indiviuduals, even strange
ones like Tarjei.
Which brings me back to Lightsearcher and
his Reducing various groups in the crosshairs of the Big Brother
Eye, as mere cancer or germs that must be eliminated, a plague,
a War on Cancer, A War on Terror and none of these Wars have
ever been won. They were all Political joy rides, massive funding
expenditures that filled the coffers of military budgets and
merely got the Collective Hive RAH-RAHing..and not the Egyptian
kind of Ra-Raing either. Real Ra-Raing is a Sun based inner Etheric
Cheering when we discover someone who actually breaks out of
the collective. Gore Vidal and George Orwell come directly to
The difference that Tarjei was trying to indicate
between I AM thinking and the I AM core and the mighty collective
Core of Orwellian thinking or group thinking that gathers itself
around some impressive imp of a thinking machine, such as the
Critics and gobbles up lie after lie and spin after spin, is
the difference between the Core Christ Being and the Collective
infection of Group Speak. To not hold Orwell up presently is
not to understand the I AM in relation to what happened in Germany
and Russia and Pol Pot.
Between Blair and Bush we have nothing but
sickening, well studied, Orwellian manipulation of facts, and
a herding of individual thinking back to the Collective fencing
of Ahriman as Shepherd of the unformed i am. If they do not meet
with the Christ or if they never hear of the I AM and the research
of how the I AM is the core of our immortality and how we grow
our I AM's with right education, than the present and predicted,
current Orwellian model is the holding pen before the slaughter.
We have seen this slaughter a million times..
a million. In the 20th century, 100,000,000 people were eliminated,
without the west or the east feeling compelled to interfere.
It suited their purposes and it suits Ahriman's purposes today.
It suits Ahriman that some how people do not have the intelligence
enough to see their collective thinking duped towards such dangerous
regions of i am numbness.
But the Medical dangers that I disagreed with
a few years ago with Lightsearcher have finally come close to
an answer. The answer comes from those who I discern in my I
AM, who have attempted to rouse themselves from the stupor of
this Orwellian blind numbness. Always one can faintly hear the
I AM attempting to stir itself into wakefulness. Now along with
this, Christopher Fry and his meaning, a Sleep of Prisoners is
really the vast difference between that which comes forth out
of the Michael School and that which comes forth from those in
the Ahrimanic herd Group Speak. Original insights were Steiner's
amazing contributions. It was never the same ole same ole, it
was always profoundly richer and deeper into I AM country. Our
job is to make sure those who venture into I AM country are understood
by a whole host of those who have begun to see what I AM country
looks like and we can see when a traveler has been there or when
a traveler has ran away in terror from that which they are not
ready to hear.
"I am a commander in the War on Germs.
Germs prey on the weak and give no respect at all to the well
intentioned. Every day, I issue orders to have them killed and
I feel no remorse in doing so. In fact, my feelings toward germs
fairly represent those of humanity in general. Everyone hates
germs. As a result, it is a simple matter to dispassionately
study, with double blind, placebo controlled scientific tests,
the best ways to defeat germs on the field of battle. Humans
gain an additional benefit from these studies when we recognize
that the same laws of nature apply to both men and germs. In
other words, the War on Germs can help us in the War on Terror.
Now one may rightfully argue that fighting
germs and fighting humans is not the same thing. For starters,
humans are generally considered to be smarter than germs. Germs
develop resistance by dumb luck. Humans do this too, but at least
occasionally, intelligence also plays a role. Germs have a hard
time communicating their knowledge to other living germs. Humans
have cell phones not to mention other, more antiquated modes
of communication. Humans employ chemical weapons against germs,
but generally avoid using such weapons of mass destruction against
other humans. So when it comes to developing resistance, it is
safe to say that humans are at least on par with germs.
Returning to the scientific studies, we find
that the Law of Natural Selection, when applied to warfare, manifests
itself as various practical rules. These rules were discovered
while studying germs, but again, they apply equally to humans
since the same laws of nature govern both groups.
1. Fighting strengthens the resistance. Scientific
studies have proven that each time we order a particular antibiotic
into battle, germs develop greater resistance to that weapon.
This is because those creatures that best resist, survive to
pass on knowledge of their superior defenses to others. Eventually,
even marvelous weapons such as the "wonder drug" penicillin
become impotent in many situations. In the same manner, each
time an army attacks its enemy, the survivors pass their knowledge
of how to resist that attack on to others. The weapons that are
used for these attacks eventually become impotent in many situations.
Hence this first rule has a logical corollary: To maximize a
weapon's effectiveness, avoid using it. Pre-emptive, prophylactic
antibiotics invariably lead to greater resistance. Physicians
are taught that the best way to keep antibiotics effective is
to avoid using them. The most potent antibiotics are used the
least. To do otherwise only invites resistance and unnecessarily
compromises our best weapons. The same logic easily applies to
2. Fighting helps enemies overcome your defenses.
Germs become more virulent the more we fight them. If we fight
them enough, even germs that were relatively harmless become
deadly. The most deadly germs of all live in hospitals where
we fight and kill them constantly. Again, we can thank the Law
of Natural Selection for this reality. Those germs that are able
to overcome our defenses in battle are the ones that survive
to pass on their abilities to others. We can expect the same
thing when we fight other humans. To survive, enemy combatants
improvise explosive devices and other weapons, change tactics,
and formulate new strategies until they find a weakness in our
defenses. They are then able to breach our defenses and tell
anyone else how to do the same. We can only guess what further
evolution in weapons and tactics await us. The corollary, then,
to this second rule is: To maintain a strong defense, avoid fighting.
3. Fighting creates enemies. The weapons that
we use against germs invariably affect bacteria that pose us
no threat. Exposure to antibiotics causes these formerly innocent
bystanders to develop resistance to our weapons and the means
to overcome our defenses. Once harmless bacteria are transformed
into lethal enemies. The unintended consequences of our fighting
cause new enemies to appear where we once had none.
To summarize, the Law of Natural Selection
tells us that the best way to maintain military superiority and
to retain strong defenses is to avoid fighting. We do this not
because it might be the most moral course of action and not because
it is perhaps the choice of the majority of those polled. We
do this even if our enemy is a universally hated, inhuman, and
amoral germ. We do this, quite simply, because it is the best
way to survive.
The War on Terror provides us an excellent
case study on the effects of the Law of Natural Selection as
it relates to armed conflict. US armed forces quickly rolled
over their opposition in both Afghanistan and Iraq, but instead
of disengaging, they continued the conflict as an occupying force.
As the Law of Natural Selection predicted, these protracted hostilities
have been accompanied by a steady increase in the strength and
sophistication of the resistance. Resistance forces within each
of these countries are increasingly able to withstand attacks
and penetrate US defenses. In addition, the US has created new,
unforeseen enemies in each area of operations.
The Taliban in Afghanistan have steadily regrouped
to the extent that they now move freely about the country and
have virtual control over large swaths of the Afghan countryside.
They are able to forcefully take control of provincial government
offices for limited periods of time. US forces, once virtually
unopposed throughout the country, are largely confined to Kabul
and a few small military bases. Even there, they are increasingly
subject to rocket attacks, car bombs, and improvised explosive
devices. Warlords who were once staunch US allies now run their
own fiefdoms within Afghanistan's borders often at cross-purposes
with US efforts. The frontier provinces of neighboring ally Pakistan
have become such a Taliban stronghold that US officials talk
of the possibility of the United States invading Pakistan in
an upcoming "spring offensive."
In Iraq, US troops initially browsed the open-air
markets and strolled the campuses in relative safety. Now they
have been forced, for their own safety, to withdraw from bases
of operations in Falluja and several other cities in the "Sunni
Triangle" to areas on the outskirts of these places. A similar
tactical retreat is underway in Baghdad. Everywhere in Iraq,
American soldiers are increasingly at risk on the ground, on
the water, and in the air. They are not safe in any of their
compounds; not even in the "green zone," the heart
of the occupation, where rocket and mortar rounds strike on an
almost daily basis. The resistance is obtaining more sophisticated
weapons, improving the ones they already have, and learning how
to use both more effectively against the United States. US aircraft
and armored vehicles are being destroyed with increasing frequency.
The world is watching and learning as the resistance to the US
occupation perfects tactics and strategies that are increasingly
able to neutralize the United States Armed Forces. Mujahadeen
from all over the Muslim world and beyond are entering Iraq to
join the resistance to the US occupation. Al-Qaeda, essentially
nonexistent in most of Iraq prior to the US occupation, is now
present throughout the country and plays an expanding role in
George Bush might be able to fool the American
public when he says, "We are safer now because of our ongoing
efforts in the War on Terror." In making such claims, President
Bush might violate the public trust, but he cannot violate the
laws of nature. Because the enemy has learned to adapt, US strategy,
tactics, and weapons systems are all less effective now than
they were before the start of the "War on Terror."
Our enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq, on the other hand, through
practice, have been able to improve their ability to penetrate
US defenses and are teaching others how to do the same. While
the world demonstrated its allegiance and friendship to the United
States on September 11th, 2001, we now see increasing anti-American
sentiment even in nations that are our allies. Each day
we continue to be actively engaged in hostilities in Afghanistan
and Iraq the situation further deteriorates.
As a physician, I am awed when I witness how,
when we use antibiotics inappropriately, the Law of Natural Selection
may allow what starts as a tiny infection, a few microscopic
germs, to overwhelm an entire body's defenses and to devastate
it. Strong, seemingly invulnerable, towering physical specimens
are ravaged and sometimes killed. When this happens, physicians
deny responsibility. "It is all the germs fault," we
say. "Those vile creatures!" But deep down inside,
in an unspoken place, we know that we bear some of the responsibility.
In response, our first inclination is to over-react. We want
to fire antibiotics at all potential threats, real or imagined.
When we come to our senses, we realize that if we do this we
only strengthen the resistance, and increase the likelihood of
even deadlier future assaults. Instead, we use antibiotics, not
preemptively, but only in clear-cut cases of self-defense. We
stop as soon as the threat is repelled. We do this not because
we sympathize with the germs; we hate them. We do this because
it is the best way to survive.
Americans tend to have the gut feeling that
the entire body of our mighty nation could not be invaded and
destroyed. Our defenses are too strong for that to happen, we
believe. The United States of America may suffer occasional injuries
and attacks, but we are more than capable of fighting them off.
Yet if we as a nation act in an unhealthy manner, if we disregard
the laws of nature, we will weaken our defenses and become more
susceptible to our enemies. Are we as a nation, already too sick
to realize that what begins as a minor illness may develop into
a fatal disease if it is not treated with care? It has happened
before. We must avoid weakening our defenses. There is no time
to waste. The resistance increases as we speak."
February 7, 2004
Critics, and Controversy
Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files
Anthroposophy & Anarchism
Anthroposophy & Scientology