EcoChristology
and Ecofascism 1
EcoChristology and Ecofascism 2
From: holderlin66
Date: Thu Jun 10, 2004 7:17 am
Subject: Re: EcoChristology and Ecofascism
holderlin wrote:
Ecofascism and Ecobrotherhood
If strengthening the etheric body through
the wisdom of education, understanding epidemiology from the
standpoint of astral, etheric and I AM forces and building on
the new Christ Brotherhood potential in the new Etheric forces
of humanity, means that there is nothing more advanced than the
Ecobrotherhood presented by Spiritual Science. It is here where
plant pests are studied with specific attention to how weaknesses
in the etheric earth, the soil, the air, or seeds give rise to
how illness is attacted to weaknesses in the etheric structure
and the plants themselves reflect infestations that reveal real
etheric weaknesses in the plant and elemental community. Ecobrotherhood
boasts of a science of healing and assisting plants and the elemental
community to lend us their forces to improve the etheric health
of plants.
These weaknesses in plants and the etheric
world are countered by consciously using right Spiritual Science
techniques to constantly find balance and health for plants,
animal and human existence. If it be Waldorf Education that gives
the future and growing I AM new forces of thinking and brotherhood;
If it be new healing aspects of the Arts of medicine, curative
Eurythmy, painting, that work with rejuvenating the astral body
with new techniques in color work and theme, these are Ecobrotherhood
realities that counteract the direction of Ecofascism that has
arisen and runs through military, corporate and political ideologies.
The difference is striking.
Contrasting Ecofascism with Ecobrotherhood
and healing concepts that arise that serve humanity against and
instead of extermination paradigms, such as GM, or genetically
manipulated etheric structures of various plants, reveal thought
manipulations of ecofascism. If we change and mix goats and sheeps
together we carry a sharp attack into the group soul of the animals.
This Genetically Manipulated attack into the group soul of animals
is an attribute of EcoFascism.
To study what the various species have
and what they contribute to the ecological system has only begun
to be explored. Rachel Carson began the study of the interconnectedness
of the eco system and the interdependency of various species,
wet lands, mountains, pollution, atmosphere, lakes, ponds and
run off of pesticide pollutants. Ecobrotherhood has grown and
now extends into the dangerous manipulation of etheric forces
in GM or Genetically Manufactured and manipulated life forms.
Rather than understand Earth's initmate relationships, Ecofascism,
like Fascism in general, overrides and imposes a new nature over
a nature science is too frustrated to understand. That includes
human nature, the sea the health of the sea, the air, the plants
and the animals spread out in nature. It includes regions where
the Earth breathes, vents, cools, heats up, sheds, migrations
of the astral navigation of animals..all meddled and imposed
upon, because we don't want to understand the larger picture.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/061004G.shtml
Designer Ecosystems are
Now in Vogue
By David Suzuki
Environmental News Network
Tuesday 08 June 2004
We have designer clothes and
designer perfumes. Now we need designer ecosystems - at least
according to a group of scientists writing a report in the journal
Science.
The authors argue that humans
have so monumentally interfered with the planet's natural systems
that we have to stop focusing on the fewer and fewer remaining
undisturbed ecosystems on Earth. Instead, they say, we need to
focus a lot more on the services nature provides and how to modify
ecosystems to make sure they can continue to provide these services
in a human-dominated world.
It's an interesting idea.
Natural services are essential for human survival. Even with
all our ingenuity, we cannot artificially recreate the systems
that have evolved over 4 billion years on this planet to build
the very conditions necessary for life to exist.
As far as we know, ours is
the only planet in the entire universe to have accomplished this
monumental task. From water filtration to climate stability and
soil fertility, there is an intelligence embedded in these natural
systems that we are only just beginning to fathom.
At the same time, human activities
are pushing the capacity of these systems to their limits. And
with a projected population of 9 billion by 2050, we cannot afford
to continue with business as usual.
With this in mind, the authors
bring up two very important points. First, the knowledge that
we do have about ecosystem services is not widely disseminated,
and it is certainly not being acted upon.
For example, we have known
for some time about the importance of city green spaces for water
filtration. Plants and soil are essential in helping remove impurities
from our water. Yet, rarely is this knowledge incorporated into
urban design. Instead, we funnel rainwater from our roads and
rooftops into concrete drainage systems that empty directly into
our lakes and rivers - causing tremendous pollution.
Second, as the authors point
out, all the scientific knowledge in the world won't protect
natural services unless the public understands that they are
vital to our health and well being. Without the public bringing
sufficient pressure to bear on our political and business leaders,
those leaders are unlikely to make the policy changes needed
to ensure the protection of ecosystem services.
But for all its value, the
report does miss some key points. First, the analysis provides
barely any sense of how little we actually know. We are only
just beginning to understand how our complicated natural systems
work.
We don't even have an adequate
grasp of how many species there are on the planet or what they
do.
Also missing is the crucial
point that there are still intact ecosystems providing important
services to humanity. Large parts of the Amazon basin and Canada's
boreal forest are still fairly pristine. These forests are extremely
important resources for life diversity and climate stability.
Removal of their forest cover
would have profound repercussions in terms of global weather
patterns and climate change. Even small patches of relatively
undisturbed ecosystems in or near our cities are extremely valuable
in terms of providing refuge for wildlife.
Extreme caution is also necessary
around the very idea of designing ecosystems. Generally, minimal
interference has proven to be the best policy. In fact, whenever
humans have tried to design or modify ecosystems in the past,
it has usually resulted in disaster. Ecosystems are incredibly
complicated. We barely know how parts of these systems function,
let alone the whole. For example, when we have introduced alien
species, we have inadvertently caused a host of other unexpected
problems.
Still, any discussion of natural
services is very important. The value of these services is largely
ignored in our current economic and political systems. We treat
them as though they are free and limitless, when in fact they
are invaluable and irreplaceable.
And although designer ecosystems
may be necessary one day, more important are thoughtfully designed
human systems, from our cities to our energy sources and our
agriculture. It's much easier to learn to live within the natural
systems we have now than to try to desperately redesign the ones
we have left later."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
June/July
2004
The Uncle
Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files
Anthroposophy & Anarchism
Anthroposophy & Scientology
Anthroposophical
Morsels
Anthroposophy,
Critics, and Controversy
