Origin of a Bad Race
From: DByron
Date: Tue Mar 16, 2004 4:10 pm
Subject: origin of a bad race
Here's an idea I'd like to toss into the discussion
about race. It is related to the ongoing thread, though perhaps
from a more imaginative perspective than a strictly intellectual
one.
In the business & technology section of
my local newspaper there are 2 front page articles, one on a
newly emerging field called neuromarketing (the use of brainscans
in predicting consumer behavior) and another on the development
of a robotic exoskeleton fashioned to be used by soldiers to
carry heavy loads for long distances. It was interesting that
in this second article the designers spent some time explaining
that their device wouldn't make the user into a 'cyborg killing
machine'.
It all got me thinking about human genetic
engineering, biological machines, nanotechonology etc., and wondering
at what point would tinkering with the human genome result in
something that could be called a new race -- by the standards
employed in this list discussion. Now I tend to think, probably
along with some science fiction writers, that the development
of a patented, genetically engineered type of soldier is quite
likely. Just imagine the advantage gained on any battlefield
along with a reduction in the problem of 'friendly human-soldier'
casualties. Not to mention the profits. But regardless of the
use of potential GE beings, when does one say that a new race
has been created? Would it be likely to be someone you'd want
as a neighbor? Or might it be prone to turn out 'bad'. Might
we then be faced with a Human Race and then also another one
that you might not want to run into walking down the street?
This, in my view, is infinitely more plausible
as the splitting of mankind Steiner referred to, rather than
some existing race deteriorating into evil. That simply makes
no sense whatsoever.
Deborah
...................................................................................................................................
From: dottie zold
Date: Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:08 pm
Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] origin of a bad race
Deborah:
This, in my view, is infinitely more plausible
as the splitting of mankind Steiner referred to, rather than
some existing race deteriorating into evil. That simply makes
no sense whatsoever.
Dear Deborah,
I think what the critics do not understand
in as far as I can tell is that there is an ongoing consciousness
evolution of sorts. They seem to deny it exists and if one speaks
on it than that means you are a racist or are following a racist
ideology. I found an interesting reference to what you write
above but knowing how hard of hearing the critics are I am thinking
not to post it lest I give them more information that can be
twisted by Dugan and cohorts.
Thanks for the post, I will sleep on it as
I am tired right now.
Love,
Dottie
...................................................................................................................................
From: holderlin66
Date: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:49 pm
Subject: origin of a bad race
DByron wrote:
It all got me thinking about human genetic
engineering, biological machines, nanotechonology etc., and wondering
at what point would tinkering with the human genome result in
something that could be called a new race -- by the standards
employed in this list discussion. Now I tend to think, probably
along with some science fiction writers, that the development
of a patented, genetically engineered type of soldier is quite
likely. Just imagine the advantage gained on any battlefield
along with a reduction in the problem of 'friendly human-soldier'
casualties. Not to mention the profits. But regardless of the
use of potential GE beings, when does one say that a new race
has been created? Would it be likely to be someone you'd want
as a neighbor? Or might it be prone to turn out 'bad'. Might
we then be faced with a Human Race and then also another one
that you might not want to run into walking down the street?
This, in my view, is infinitely more plausible
as the splitting of mankind Steiner referred to, rather than
some existing race deteriorating into evil. That simply makes
no sense whatsoever.
Deborah
Bradford, loved the question from the start;
Ahriman is our mimic flesh-tone companion
with a Shylock version of a Pound of Flesh. He is able to mix
a very unique batch of new human. Give him a Petri dish and he'll
create his own human race, sayeth Zarathustra! (Yes Zarathustra
again and try to understand in your studies what this really
means)
Synopsis:
A modern retelling of Shakespeare's MERCHANT
OF VENICE, A POUND OF FLESH is the story of Antonio, a wealthy
merchant who borrows a sum of money from the Jewish money lender
Shylock. When Antonio is unable to repay the debt, Shylock attempts
to collect the agreed upon bond: a pound of Antonio's flesh.
God or Ahriman has a wager out and a mark,
(read Cain), a real Soprano Marker out on mankind. (a mark is
a bet, a promise to pay) With the help of Science, Ahriman is
out to mine the codes hidden in man to remake man. For either
God, "who from stones can raise children of Abraham"
or Ahriman; "Turn these stones into bread".. Are we
not our creators children? We have borrowed from Ahriman since
Atlantis, when this Race Card issue was brought to the table
of matter. It took us, 666-1332-1998 to arrive where men have
moved beyond the myth of Homunculus to the fact of Homunculus.
This is indeed the source of the problem in Peter's failed arguments.
"The alchemist Paracelsus
once proposed that he had created a false human being through
his science. Called a homunculus, this creature stood no more
than 12 inches tall and does the work usually associated with
a golem. However, after a short time, the homunculus was known
to turn on its creator and run away. The recipe consisted of
a bag of bones, sperm, skin fragments and hair from any animal
you wanted it to be a hybrid of. This was to be laid in the ground
surrounded by horse manure for forty days, at which point the
embryo would form. This supposed beast relied upon the theories
of spontaneous generation."
Now above all with Hammerling's indication
and Paracelsus the creeping dawn of vision that leads to our
doorstep was rising in Dr. Steiner's cognition as he smelled
the future. The payback from Atlantis was coming and the tab
was gonna be very, very high. We have borrowed our flesh without
concern who paid the bill. Once Initiate Schooling became public,
we could no long sleep through the questions of flesh and Spirit.
The Bill was due and Ahriman would make these cowardly humans
pay. Now Ahriman is having open season in the brains and political
spin of human activity and this was in the mix since Atlantis
and before. History! I spit on the history of misrepresentation
that P.S. has built his house of WORMWOOD on.
Dare we call the
worship of "The Church of the Unrisen Light" what it
is? It is a true cult of our times and everyone, even those on
this list, hold worship in their heart of hearts, with the "The
Church of the Unrisen Light". Why have we not revealed the
Cult of False worship of light as a Pagan altar called, failed
Science? WE FEAR IT AND WE WORSHIP IT, it has enormous power
over our every thought. But not the Wimp who died on Golgotha,
he offers the I AM freedom to become gods.
Who has raised the alarm? Can thou in no way,
even if we draw you a map, show how Christ actively, was, the
Science of Light? And, IS, presently as the Etheric Christ, an
active mercurial healing force of Light that dwarfs our fears
of Nuclear destruction? Without us, Ahriman has nothing! Fried
to crisp we are useless to him and to ourselves. Fearing him
as a pagan god, he has it all. Better to be feared than loved
is Ahriman's motto.
PORTIA:
The quality of mercy is not
strain'd,
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath: it is twice blest;
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes:
'Tis mightiest in the mightiest: it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown;
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;
But mercy is above this sceptred sway;
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God's
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That, in the course of justice, none of us
Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy. I have spoke thus much
To mitigate the justice of thy plea;
Which if thou follow, this strict court of Venice
Must needs give sentence 'gainst the merchant there.
So Deborah, Oh you are onto everything here.
I ponder sometimes what tin cans our fellow Michael School attendees
are living in? This strategy to attempt to innoculate humanity,
to remove the Spirit of I AM Cognition from human thinking, would
help lock down Earth against the 6th epoch, where I AM's will
have built pathways with Sophia and have the Soul condition of
ANTHROSOPHIA, enough so that the I Am can break through and preserve
the higher memory of its immortality and past lives. Not any
longer on a "Blade Runner" scanning code.
But as we move along this treacherous trail,
the Mad Hatter is out of the Hat! The Michael School is in broken
fragments, Ahriman has planted his cult in every heart and seeks
to steal from the Gods what his renegade cosmic nature can steal.
It was our very lofty Gods who contracted Ahriman and factored
him into our ability to be Free. The Gods think that we will
be able to judge the FINISHED WORK OF THE GODS, nature and US
and see the pattern of the divine and choose it over Ahriman's
catastrophic tricks.
See how nice the words are? But what a mighty
nightmare of terror, racism, ethnic cleansing, fabricated Wars,
poisoned patches of earth, sheep stampeding fear, vicious dialectical
materialism to thwart brotherhood from arising as a clear mandate
from True Science and True Education fights for its POUND OF
HUMAN FLESH. I have a list of everything that covert Military,
so enormously and richly funds today from the worship of the
"Church of the Unrisen Light". We fund some of the
most sinsiter biological and technological research on the planet
with this tribute, titheing into tax and the "Church of
the Unrisen Light". Why don't you people talk about the
Cult, the real cult.
It is up to the Michael School to know how
and why this is running away from us. With Ahriman's incarnation
looming we are in the season of confrontations.
PORTIA:
Soft!
The Jew shall have all justice; soft! no haste:
He shall have nothing but the penalty.
GRATIANO:
O Jew! an upright judge, a learned judge!
PORTIA:
Therefore prepare thee to cut off the flesh.
Shed thou no blood, nor cut thou less nor more
But just a pound of flesh: if thou cut'st more
Or less than a just pound, be it but so much
As makes it light or heavy in the substance,
Or the division of the twentieth part
Of one poor scruple, nay, if the scale do turn
But in the estimation of a hair,
Thou diest and all thy goods are confiscate.
GRATIANO:
A second Daniel, a Daniel, Jew!
Now, infidel, I have you on the hip.
PORTIA:
Why doth the Jew pause? take thy forfeiture.
SHYLOCK:
Give me my principal, and let me go.
BASSANIO:
I have it ready for thee; here it is.
PORTIA:
He hath refused it in the open court:
He shall have merely justice and his bond.
GRATIANO:
A Daniel, still say I, a second Daniel!
I thank thee, Jew, for teaching me that word.
SHYLOCK:
Shall I not have barely my principal?
PORTIA:
Thou shalt have nothing but the forfeiture,
To be so taken at thy peril, Jew.
SHYLOCK:
Why, then the devil give him good of it!
I'll stay no longer question.
PORTIA:
Tarry, Jew:
The law hath yet another hold on you.
It is enacted in the laws of Venice,
If it be proved against an alien
That by direct or indirect attempts
He seek the life of any citizen,
The party 'gainst the which he doth contrive
Shall seize one half his goods; the other half
Comes to the privy coffer of the state;
And the offender's life lies in the mercy
Of the duke only, 'gainst all other voice.
In which predicament, I say, thou stand'st;
For it appears, by manifest proceeding,
That indirectly and directly too
Thou hast contrived against the very life
Of the defendant; and thou hast incurr'd
The danger formerly by me rehearsed.
Down therefore and beg mercy of the duke.
Initiation
and Antisemitism
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click to subscribe to anthroposophy_tomorrow
March/April
2004
The Uncle
Taz "Anthroposophy Tomorrow" Files
Anthroposophy & Anarchism
Anthroposophy & Scientology
Anthroposophical
Morsels
Anthroposophy,
Critics, and Controversy
